A Challenge

Jun. 7th, 2006 02:17 pm
acdntlpoet: (Victoria)
[personal profile] acdntlpoet
In light of recent discussion on other forums of which I am a member, (as well as: http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2006/06/print/20060603.html) I would like to pose a challenge:


The Challenge: Adequately explain how constitutionally allowing gay marriages threatens heterosexual marriages.
Sub-Challenge1: Conversely, explain how constitutionally -banning- gay marriages works to strengthen heterosexual marriages.
Sub-Challenge2: Break your response into separate political and theological arguments.

Any response must be coherent, logical, and not based solely on Biblical law taken from Leviticus.
The best, rock-solid explanation gets the prize.

The Reward: The New Kids on the Block "Hangin' Tough" CD, slightly used… a “Superior Coaches” keychain... plus whatever pocket change I may have on me, which I will be adding to daily until a winner is found. (Current coffers are at a whopping total of 56 cents).

What I hope to accomplish here is to simply get you thinking… and keep me thinking as well. Hopefully sometime within my lifetime I will see the masses realize that there is no threat and marriage will be legal regardless of gender.


…And don’t even get me started on this “pre-pregnant” crap which the CDC is putting forth as guidelines for all women AND health care organizations (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/15/AR2006051500875_pf.html). Being treated as “pre-pregnant” is offensive to any Child Free (by choice) couple.

Date: 2006-06-07 11:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] acdntlpoet.livejournal.com
Oh so sad... no NKOTB for you! :)

By the CDC's assumption, I must be pre-prostate cancer too! Better start taking those supplements!

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 181920 2122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 10:11 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios